Yes,but jawa is good and robust than royal is suitable for any height.

In my opinion if you want a jawa then go for jawa classic If you are strong to the roots and want to be part of jawa legacy then go for jawa classic and if you want just a bike to ride and with modern looks go for jawa 42. Jawa classic holds the legacy of the original Jawa in 19th century with similar looks and comparable performance. Which is a better bike either Jawa 42 or Jawa Classic, sir, 42 and jawa classic is looking very short when compared Royal classic (looking height length also) Why don't you take a test drive of both and then decide. However if you need a higher speed and the benefit of a sixth gear to cruise at higher speeds, yet at lower rpm, then it has to be the Jawa. If you are looking for leasurely cruising then the Thunderbird will suffice. The Jawa however has an edge in the performance department. Hello Daniel, both bikes are very capable and very retro in their looks. If Classic Legends do not take these into consideration, then Jawa might have a bleak future. Lack of tubeless tyre options will also deter many from opting a Jawa. So most men who are Jawa enthusiasts will have to drop their enthusiasm for Jawa and opt for other options. Jawa will be preferred by more mature men starting from around their 30s, and by that time men will be family men and for them a short seat like that in Jawa will not serve their family purposes. Young boys maturing to ride bikes will prefer sporty bikes. Also Jawa's pickup had no competition in those earlier days, but now things are different, with plenty of options. Thats true, Jawa is a city bike with a contradictory gear box, i.e., seating posture is for the city, but gear box is for the highway.

For long Drive Which one is good JAWA or Royal Enfield Thunderbird?

Jawa type 210